{"id":281,"date":"2018-10-09T23:13:29","date_gmt":"2018-10-09T23:13:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/?p=281"},"modified":"2018-10-09T23:13:29","modified_gmt":"2018-10-09T23:13:29","slug":"step-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/step-5\/","title":{"rendered":"Step 5"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Step 5 \u2014 Report Annually on Supply Chain Due Diligence<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Report publicly on the compa\u00adny\u2019s due dili\u00adgence efforts for respon\u00adsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high risk areas. No confi\u00adden\u00adtial infor\u00adma\u00adtion such as supplier rela\u00adtion\u00adships, price infor\u00adma\u00adtion, or iden\u00adti\u00adties of whistle blowers should be published.<\/li>\n<li>Reports should focus on company actions to address iden\u00adti\u00adfied risks (i.e. manage\u00adment systems in place, steps taken to iden\u00adtify smelters and refiners in the supply chain, risk assess\u00adment method\u00adology, assess\u00adment of smelter\/refiner\u2019s risks and due dili\u00adgence steps in accor\u00addance to the OECD Guidance, steps taken to manage risk, efforts made to monitor and track perfor\u00admance for risk mitigation).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Step 5 \u2014 Report Annually on Supply Chain Due Diligence Report publicly on the compa\u00adny\u2019s due dili\u00adgence efforts for respon\u00adsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high risk areas. No confi\u00adden\u00adtial infor\u00adma\u00adtion such as supplier rela\u00adtion\u00adships, price infor\u00adma\u00adtion, or iden\u00adti\u00adties of whistle blowers should be published. Reports should focus on company actions to address\u2026<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"bookmark\" class=\"andre_button_alt2 wvc-button wvc-button-size-xs\" href=\"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/step-5\/\"><span>Continue reading<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wp_typography_post_enhancements_disabled":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry","clearfix","entry-grid","entry-columns-default","entry-post-module-layout-standard","no-post-thumbnail","entry-post","entry-masonry_modern","entry-post-masonry_modern"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":282,"href":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281\/revisions\/282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.duediligenceguidance.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}